This increase appears to be due to both a reduction in carrier density and a reduction in mobility. An anomalous increase of the low-temperature resistivity is observed for some compounds at certain doping levels. The anion disorder in 1 T-TaS 2-xSe x, on the other hand, does not suppress transitions toward the commensurate state at any x. Beyond a doping level of ~10% the commensurate state no longer exists. Cation doping is found to slightly suppress the onset temperature T 0 of the CDW, but to suppress much more rapidly the lock-in to the commensurate state at T d. This is still just thoughts though.Electrical, magnetic, and thermal properties of 1 T-TaS 2 and 1 T-TaSe 2 doped with cations (Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb), 1 T-Nb 1-xTi xS 2Se, and 1 T-TaS 2-xSe x are reported, with particular emphasis on the effects of doping on the charge density wave (CDW) observed in the parent compounds. There are an incredible amount of potential issues that could be caused by this but I think they can be ironed out at least for one specific use case, and from there it may be possible to make it easily configurable. You'd also be able to maintain track color consistency between non-mixer and non-timeline which would be cool. When you open hydrogen it's recognized as an instrument and a track is created for that in all your programs too. For example if a track is created in non-mixer then a track of the same name is created in non-timeline and a carla-rack is created for it, and they're all connected in a predefined chain. I've been thinking of some sort of LAU DAW-supervisor program that can communicate with LAU apps to self-organize itself into a coherent DAW using JACK. I actually like the idea of keeping plugins as separate JACK clients even more than using an internal carla patchbay. Something like this could also be configured to handle edge cases like sidechaining. Functionally it'd act as a rack but if you wanted you could mangle the inputs. An alternate carla patchbay/rack hybrid could show the plugins stacked horizontally/vertically with their connections and you can drag/drop plugins inbetween other plugins to add or remove them from the chain.
It would have to be configurable to handle multiple situations and wouldn't solve every problem but would help for most. There's got to be a better way that still retains patchbay flexibility. If you want to reorder plugins it's just as bad. Particularly I like the patchbay flexibility but not its cumbersomeness: for example, when you want to add a plugin in carla to an existing signal chain you have toġ) search for the plugin (also i think the best way to do this is an external sample/plugin browser so it can interact not only with carla but also with other programs like hydrogen or another drum machine or sampler)Ĥ) remove the existing two connections (detrimental if you are doing things live which i always do) That'd be good, but I think if possible carla rack/patchbay should remain separate applications from carla-mixer to maintain LAU modularity (though your secret agenda may be to write the next ardour?). This is not something for 2.0, but I won't stop anyone from trying it.
Like a standalone mixer where each strip is a separate carla-rack.
I've been thinking of a Carla-Mixer design myself. RUN WAVES PLUGINS LIVE ON YOUR CONSOLEMultiRack is a software host that lets FOH and monitor engineers run multiple, simultaneous instances of the same award-winning Waves plugins used in recording studios and mixing rooms the world over. Sorry to pile so much onto your plate as usual falktx. Is lv2 never going to be able to support dynamic numbers of ports? That seems like a terrible design limitation. i have been thinking of alternate designs lately but haven't come up with anything concrete. Then again i am also beginning to disdain the patchbay for its inefficiency and clutter. given how carla seems to revolve around the patchbay more and more the rack gui doesn't seem like the most efficient design. for patch-bay i'm assuming it acts as normal unracked carla?
i recall you saying for carla-rack the only plugin receiving midi-in would be the first. plugin reordering still not implemented, any ETA on this? i saw it's already listed on github as a bug plugin save/loading still does not work which is a huge problem. am i the only person in LAU who wishes sidechaining were better supported? is it possible to custom-compile my own 3i/2o carla patchbay? one of the reasons i was excited about carla-rack having a plugin was because it could make it easier to sidechain things but it is still as hard as ever since carla-patchbay only has 2 i/o (or 16/32). what's the difference between the FX modes and normal modes?